Good Evening Dear Readers,
Here is the answer for the question I asked in my last post!!
Here is the twist from Govt to cover the Armsgate not by hanging but projecting Justice Katju which took uproar on top of Armsgate.
Two times Govt used hanging strategy to suppress the big issues of India and this time they thought lets take another way of suppressing the Armsgate issue before it takes the nationwide popularity by having the debate in Parliament.
UPA tried to attack Mr. Modi in different platforms of Media and failed to suppress Mr. Modi's popularity; now they used Justice Katju to suppress Mr. Modi.
My questions:
1. When Katju opens up his statement on Mr. Modi for 2002, where were his comments on Modi till now and why suddenly these came out?
2. When Indian Judiciary courts (Supreme Court, SIT and all other Judiciary bodies) given a clean chit to Mr. Modi, why didn't Katju made the statements when he was the Judge in Supreme Court?
3. A person in a Judicial Post states himself as common man and alleges the political statements; doesn't this shows that a person is misusing his post by becoming chairman & gets attention of people and then commenting politically on a Political leader as common man when he has the attention of becoming the PCI's chairman?
This is just an another strategy of this Govt to cover the Armsgate and change people of India's mood from Armsgate to 2002 in Gujarat.
Advise to Justice Katju: If you want to make political statements, as per Mr. Digvijay's open offer to everyone; join politics n then make political statements!!
Does this kind of activity suits a person from Judicial Post?
Here is the answer for the question I asked in my last post!!
Here is the twist from Govt to cover the Armsgate not by hanging but projecting Justice Katju which took uproar on top of Armsgate.
Two times Govt used hanging strategy to suppress the big issues of India and this time they thought lets take another way of suppressing the Armsgate issue before it takes the nationwide popularity by having the debate in Parliament.
UPA tried to attack Mr. Modi in different platforms of Media and failed to suppress Mr. Modi's popularity; now they used Justice Katju to suppress Mr. Modi.
My questions:
1. When Katju opens up his statement on Mr. Modi for 2002, where were his comments on Modi till now and why suddenly these came out?
2. When Indian Judiciary courts (Supreme Court, SIT and all other Judiciary bodies) given a clean chit to Mr. Modi, why didn't Katju made the statements when he was the Judge in Supreme Court?
3. A person in a Judicial Post states himself as common man and alleges the political statements; doesn't this shows that a person is misusing his post by becoming chairman & gets attention of people and then commenting politically on a Political leader as common man when he has the attention of becoming the PCI's chairman?
This is just an another strategy of this Govt to cover the Armsgate and change people of India's mood from Armsgate to 2002 in Gujarat.
Advise to Justice Katju: If you want to make political statements, as per Mr. Digvijay's open offer to everyone; join politics n then make political statements!!
Does this kind of activity suits a person from Judicial Post?
No comments:
Post a Comment